So I’ve just finished reading On Becoming Babywise II by Gary Ezzo.
Sigh.
Where do I begin?
To start with its an incredibly sexist book and stinks of the husband being the head of the household and everyone else being subservient. Don’t bother even touching this book if you’re not married. The first chapter talks about the importance of marriage and how it lays the moral foundations for children. Okay. While I believe that a stable home is incredibly important for children I think that can be provided married or not.
Ezzo then attacks child centered parenting. Apparently, and these are direct quotes, the dangers of child-centered parenting are as follows -
1. Child-centered parenting attacks the husband-wife relationship by reducing its practical significance.
2. Child-centered parenting reverses the natural process of moral developing by prematurely creating within a child a false sense of self-reliance.
3. Child-centered parenting fosters family independence, not family interdepence.
4. Child-centered parenting magnifies conflict between the natural way of a child and his or her need for moral conformity.
5. Child-centered parenting is reactive not proactive.
In other words, Mr Ezzo has no idea what he’s talking about.
1. Most couples practicing attachment parenting understand the importance of the formative years of their childs life and work as a team. My DH and I are attachment parents and our marriage is stronger since having the children. We make time for each other and have alone time. We just put family time as the highest priority.
2. Self-reliant? Hardly. This book is aimed at children 5-15 months so my son fits in that bracket. He relies completely on myself and my husband for survival. Yes he is learning to self-regulate how much he eats, how much sleep he needs, when he’s had enough play time, and allowing him to do so teaches him self-control. In her book Baby Led Weaning Gill Rapley talks about BLW and it’s link to self-regulating the appetite and spoon feeding purée being more likely to result in a lack of self-control when eating as an adult.
3. Neither of my children are the center of the family rather we work as a family unit ensuring EVERYONES needs within the family are met in a way that brings everyone happiness. Yes as the adults we make most of the decisions HOWEVER what the children like or do not like or want or need is ALWAYS taken into consideration. We want our children to learn compromise not automatic obedience.
4. This assumes that attachment parenting involves no correction or direction, far from it. It’s just done in a manner that is respectful to the child.
5. This assumes that attachment parents don’t do anything until the child cries out. No. Again. Wrong. This is why I dislike the use of the term demand feeding, it should be called cue feeding because we watch for our babies hunger signs not cries. It’s all about watching and listening. You can tell that a 5 month old is hungry long before she cries.
I do agree that your relationship still needs nurturing even after your baby is here. There needs to be balance though.
Solids Advice
So this is where it gets confusing, he says that milk is important until 1 but then downplays the importance of breastmilk (Breastfeeding for more than a year is a preference, since adequate alternates to breastmilk are usually available. OBBII p.51)
The weirdest piece of advice is to offer one breast then solids then the other breast or half the bottle then solids then the other half. Everything else I’ve read about introducing solids says milk first at least half an hour before. Later in the book he suggests babies may be waking at night because they need more solids, absolute myth.
Then it gets really strange. There’s a whole chapter on Highchair Manners. For offenses such as flipping the plate, dropping or throwing food, playing with food, placing messy hands in the hair, banging on the tray, standing in the Highchair, arching the back, spitting raspberries or screaming and fussy he suggests verbal correction (okay, I do this, I try to stay calm, although will admit to being less then calm when my then 8 month old threw handfuls of cous cous on the floor and then smeared sauce all through my hair when I picked him up, I say “we don’t throw food” or “please don’t put weetbix in your hair” or whatever, calm, polite, requesting, it might take a long time but doing the same I have a 2 and a half year old with wonderful table manners that have been modeled to her.)
Then Ezzo suggests isolation in the crib. For normal baby behaviour. And then loss of privileges or toys. And then “a light to moderate squeeze of the hand.”. He then claims its attention getting and a teaching tool that won’t leave your child paychologically scarred, affect the child’s self-esteem, train the child to hit other children, teach the child violence, or cause the child abuse in adulthood.
We know better then this. When I was a child spanking was commonplace and accepted. I was spanked, though not often, and I have no ill-feeling towards my parents or my upbringing. But I’m lucky, I escaped potential negative consequence, but I don’t want to risk that for my children.
When we know better we do better.
Here is an article about spanking and here is a report. It states that -
Corporal punishment… is a predictor of poorer child mental health (12 of 12 studies), eroded parent-child relationships (13 of 13 studies), weaker internalization of moral standards (13 of 15 studies), increased child aggression (27 of 27 studies), and increased child anti-social behaviour (11 of 12 studies.)
Total opposite of Ezzo’s claim. I know what you’re thinking he’s only suggesting a moderate squeeze. But he says you need to create discomfort. Later in the chapter Some Thoughts About Discipline he warns parents that they need to correct childishness and foolishness. That children (as young as 5 months mind you) need to learn first time obedience and using a mild attention getting swat when a baby touches something they shouldn’t.
How heart breaking. Smacking a baby.
Naptime is next topic and sleep time. What struck me is this.
Rule one: Mom, not baby, decides when the nap starts.
Rule two:Mum, not baby, decides when the nap ends.
What a load. My child is a human being not a robot, he sleeps when he’s tired and wakes up when he’s not anymore, simple. This is not a power struggle. It warns against putting baby in bed with you even if they are in pain or sick.
The baby sign stuff is pretty cool, but if you want to learn about baby sign by an actual baby sign book, it’s more in depth and has more signs and their uses.
Hints on potty training. Pretty generic stuff until…
“If your child is still on a bottle, is not on any routine during the day, is not sleeping through the night, naps in-consistently, sleeps with you or doesn’t obey instructions, then toileting will not come easy. You must deal with those issues first.
So if your baby isn’t ‘performing’ then you aren’t.
CONCLUSION
I’ve never read something more horrible in my life. It’s all about baby training not parenting. Babies aren’t meant to behave perfectly every time. A mothers day isn’t suppose to center around baby schedules and discipline of her 5-15 month old. Attachment parenting allows for flexibility and for the needs of both the parents AND the children to be met.
If you believe in treating children and babies with love, kindness and respect then do not follow Ezzo.
Like this:
Like Loading...